tag:mrzod.com,2013:/posts Buy Low, Live Free 2026-05-11T15:10:46Z tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2288529 2026-05-11T15:10:46Z 2026-05-11T15:10:46Z A quiet mind, a slow morning

As I was walking back home after dropping my daughter to school, I saw one of our new neighbors now has a second, smaller, mini scooter. They moved in with a baby infant and a 4 year old. Now that baby can ride a scooter. Life keeps going, no matter how busy work gets. Need to stop and appreciate life once in a while.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2285209 2026-04-30T19:22:14Z 2026-04-30T19:24:14Z Sometimes you get lucky

Less than a year ago, I shared that this blog would go through a reboot switching from writing about crypto to personal financing. Well, it seems that post was quite prescient: 

Today's stock is Alphabet (Google). I opened a new relatively large position of about 550 shares at an average price of $182 / share.

I'll write an in-depth article soon on why I like Alphabet, but as Soros used to say "Invest first, investigate later". 

Less than a year later, that position has more than doubled and I have yet to write an in-depth article about why I like Alphabet. Well, let me provide a short summary of why I like it as a shareholder and where the risks may lie:

What I like:
Google, unlike many of the frontier AI labs, owns the full stack. From TPU chips, Google Cloud hosting, closed (Gemini) and open (Gemma) models to consumer devices, they own everything, including the ability to train the AI models from their users' data (hoovered up from Google Maps, YouTube, Search data, etc.)

From 2022 - 2024, the consensus thinking was that Google was late to the game, which in hindsight, was true. But what most people did not recognize at the time was that Google was swimming like a duck. Above the water's surface, things seemed to be status quo but underwater, the team was working around the clock. The Code Red announcement -- which Sundar must have known would be leaked -- only reinforced the urgency of the situation.

Now, following this week's earnings, it's clear that Google Cloud is a key advantage over the independent AI labs (namely OpenAI and Anthropic), who have to pay a hefty margin on top of the already competitive API pricing they are charging its customers. Since Google is vertically integrated, they need to balance serving its internal customers (Gmail, Gemini users) and its external customers (Anthropic and other hosted models). Per Sundar on a recent podcast interview, internal customers have much longer LTV than external customers, who can switch with little notice.

I like owning Google because it gives me wide exposure AI. It's like owning a basket of AI stock all under one roof. I don't have to worry about excess capex capacity because its external cloud customers can soak it up; I can't say the same for Meta or Oracle, who have similar problems but different end customers to serve. 

Given my bullish views on AI, holding Google for the long-term is a no brainer to me. 

It's quite amazing how quickly the public narrative can shift once execution is on display in the public markets. I think having quarterly reporting is a strength, not a weakness, of the U.S. stock market. 

What I'm keeping an eye on:
Given my bullish views, my concern is primarily focused on execution and over investment in the near-term. Google is projecting capex of $180-190B in 2026, while their TTM cash flow (before capex) is $175B. This year they will essentially breakeven on cash flow. Another way to think about overextension is if they allocate their internal resource to pet projects or lesser known ROI projects. AI research can be a slippery slope: How much capex (or human researchers) do you allocate to a project without knowing what the return may be? You know you need to allocate resources because the math shows that by throwing more compute and people behind a problem, the better the solution but what does that look like?

Already we're hearing that researchers, who are assessed based on their server utilization, are re-running programs to artificially boost internal metrics lest they draw their manager's ire. How much of that is going on at Google today? If AI developments hit a plateau, how will Google know if its researchers are doing real work vs. fake work?

The AI race now appears to be Google's to lose. They have all the cards, now they just need to play it smart. 
]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2284159 2026-04-26T15:14:24Z 2026-04-26T15:14:31Z Intel


I sold Intel just a few days before the U.S. government announced their investment. It was sold via a covered call, which I thought was a fair price at the time. 

My thesis was that Intel being the sole national champion of semiconductors would never find itself facing bankruptcy and that the U.S. government would do whatever it could in its power to support it. I never imagined that the government would become an equity investor, though. My holding period was quite short, at around six months. 

The lesson I learned is that it takes a long time for a thesis to play out, especially for a capital intensive business like Intel. I should not have exited after making only a 20% gain if I had conviction in the stock. Drunkenmiller said it best: Position size matters. In this case, it wasn't a massive position but when I sold, I felt a bit of validation that I was "right" and made some money.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2283391 2026-04-23T23:16:52Z 2026-04-23T23:54:12Z Drake's Gem Set Rolex

A Rolex is a nice watch, but when you add factory-set gems onto, it takes it to a whole new level. Take for example, this latest offering from Wind Vintage

It's an incredible watch. What makes it extra special is that it wasn't locked up in a safe, but was actually worn. Watches are meant to be worn. It serves a purpose. If you can't manage to wear your watch, then it isn't for you. To me, Drake's watch is extra special because you can tell from the scratches and nicks that this was a watch that loved and worn.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2282858 2026-04-21T21:50:45Z 2026-04-21T21:50:45Z Apple's new CEO

So the time has finally come: Tim Cook is retiring later this year and has named his successor, John Ternus, senior vice president of Hardware Engineering. I liked that someone in hardware is going to lead Apple in its next phase in this new AI paradigm. I've been trying to find a Mac Mini the past couple of weeks; the Apple Stores have a backlog until July and all the marketplaces (Craigslist, Facebook, Swappa, eBay) have Mac Minis or M1 Max Macbooks priced quite high relative to their pre-OpenClaw prices.

Given the successor announcement and my difficulty in locating an affordable Mac Mini, I decided to place a small buy order of AAPL today. I opened a small position of $10,000 to start tracking the stock. From my research, I've noted that the Apple hardware differs from Windows in that the memory is unified (or shared) across OS and GPU. What that means in practice is that the memory can be used flexibly across CPU and GPU which is a powerful combination. In the Windows world, which I am most familiar with, my computer RAM and Nvidia GPU RAM (aka Video RAM or VRAM) are separate. 

When loading up local AI models, I'm limited by my GPU's RAM. Since I have an Nvidia 5080 that means my max VRAM is 16GB which is not that much; I can accommodate a model that is has about 13B parameters or so. Whereas a Mac with 32GB can use a much more powerful model. 

In my experience as a consumer trying to run AI models, my first preference would be use a local model since my costs are fixed. I don't see a massive market for on-demand inference where consumers are paying for tokens. People like Netflix and YouTube because the costs are known upfront. Given the pace of open source AI models, I expect that Apple silicone is going to be able to power ever more powerful open source models within the next 3 years. That will create demand for Apple hardware. Of course, cloud inference will always be around but will mostly be used by enterprises.

I'm excited for Apple. Having a hardware guy at the helm is the exact type of person they need to lead the company now. 

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2282853 2026-04-21T21:40:03Z 2026-04-21T21:43:07Z Finally installed the deployant (after 5 years of owning it)

Back in 2021, during Covid, I purchased an Artem RM-style deployant hoping to pair it with my IWC Big Pilot. But, alas, I couldn't get the fitting just right and the deployant required a tiny flathead screwdriver which I didn't own at the time.

Fast forward ~5 years later I finally found a screwdriver that fits the screw. I had it all along and never thought of using it until now. I actually bought an eyeglass screwdriver kit off Amazon for $4.50 but the flat edge was too thick so it didn't work. Of course, I was 3 days past the return window so now I have an unused, brand new screwdriver kit for whenever someone's eyeglasses' screw comes loose. 

The deployant is actually quite easy to install once the pin screw is screwed in. If makes a secure fit, much better than simply using a spring bar.

Here is the final result, which I quite like. The buckle is quite thin so it doesn't feel bulky. One thing that was surprising to me was that the deployant adds a bit of length so I actually had to size down. I'm now using the last strap hole. Shoutout to Holben's Watch Strap  for selling me the Fluco Alcantara watch strap for $45. You can get a coupon for signing up as a new customer.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2278217 2026-04-06T19:39:26Z 2026-04-06T19:57:27Z You can see the seesawing as investors digest the news in real-time

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2276992 2026-04-02T16:33:09Z 2026-04-02T16:40:36Z Trumps non-speech speech

I'm not usually a day trader, but I couldn't help myself when Trump and his team informed the public earlier this week that the President is going to make a speech to the American public on Wednesday at 9 pm ET. 

Leading up to the speech, Marco Rubio released the following 2 min video:

His tone made me feel less than 100% confident in the administration's plan, so I decided to follow my gut and place an order to buy two put options on $QQQ at $575. In other words, I'd only make money if $QQQ traded below the strike price of $575; the stock closed April 1 at $584.31, which means it would have to dip 2% before I make any money.

Here's the Trump speech:

This morning, I saw that $QQQ was trading at or just below $585, so I immediately placed a market order to close my position. I pocketed nearly $400. It feels good to make money and even better following my gut. However, as Drunkenmiller has said, it doesn't matter that you're right: You need to be right AND have conviction (by putting up a big position). It's fine to lose (a little bit of) money and be wrong, but not that great if you're right and made only a few bucks. 

Thankfully I sold in time (hey, making money is still making money) as $QQQ has since recovered from this morning's low:

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2270308 2026-03-12T03:19:03Z 2026-03-12T03:21:12Z VTI: Buy and hold

Over a sufficiently long period of time, VTI has always had a positive return. There's something to be said about a buy and hold mentality and the American economy's innovative spirit. If you have the patience, the power of compounding even works in your favor because of the dividends that are paid that generate a return when reinvested. Bet on America.

On the other hand, buying single stocks and holding may not necessarily get you any returns. In this case, I've held Disney for over a decade and actually LOST money. Who would have thought that Disney, known for its parks and movies, could have negative returns after holding for a decade??

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2259836 2026-02-05T03:50:51Z 2026-02-05T03:51:04Z IH-2526J Iron Heart canvas jacket

I bought this jacket over the summer (absolute steal on eBay), BUT the issue is that the jacket is snug. I can only wear a t-shirt underneath. Also, the cuff is too tight for me to wear a wrist watch, so I leave the cuff unbuttoned. I wasn't sure if this is considered faux pas for a jacket this nice. Did a quick Google Images search, and turn out that most people do leave the cuff button undone. Vindicated!

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2259733 2026-02-04T21:48:46Z 2026-02-04T21:48:46Z New strap

Replaced a traditional NATO with a stretchy NATO strap. 

What I did:

1/ Cut the strap so there's less material

2/ I burned the end with a small candle to ensure the material doesn't fall apart as easily

3/ Inserted the metal clasp

I quite like this new strap. I'll try it for a couple of weeks.


]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2259667 2026-02-04T18:24:00Z 2026-02-04T18:24:17Z GenAI images is helpful for online shopping

Since buying a vintage Rolex submariner, I've been eyeing various bracelets to swap out the OEM one to an aftermarket one. The reason is simply I want something different.

Some options that I'm considering:

1/ Staib Milanese bracelets

Staib 2784 2785 Polished Stainless Steel Milanese Mesh Watch Bracelet - Holbens

Staib 2792 Matte Stainless Steel Milanese Mesh Watch Bracelet - Holbens

2/ Forstner's Rolex bracelets

These are very high quality bracelets (read: $$$) and before pulling the trigger, I asked Manus to help imagine what they would look like on a Sub. Here are the results (including some that I passed on):

rolex_on_ladder_braceletpng


rolex_on_mesh_braceletpng


rolex_on_president_braceletpng

After looking at these results, I may just stick with the OEM bracelet. It's hard to imagine anything else fitting a Sub, frankly.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2243968 2025-12-11T22:02:14Z 2026-02-04T18:24:00Z AI is not taking away jobs

You can't expect people to understand how to use AI without holding their hands. A lot of my work involves using AI to enhance my productivity. AI has helped me save lots of time, such as brainstorming ideas, preparing call scripts in advance of an important meeting, formatting data, transcribing text from an image, etc. I work with a lot of young people (aka "the iPhone generation") who are just starting to use AI. 

At work, we encourage everyone to use AI as much as possible. But without specific direction on how to use AI, it seems that these young people have no idea what to do with AI. For example, we are preparing a year-end review post for the general public. My team member has for the past year written a weekly newsletter sharing the latest updates in a specific industry. When asked to prepare an outline on the key milestones that occurred this year, he was completely stumped on how to do it. He showed me a YTD stock price performance chart that ends in June and thought it might be relevant; hello, we're now in December!

So I simply asked him to copy and paste the financial and key highlights from each newsletter into a Google Doc, then we'd discuss it together in the afternoon. My plan is to show him that once you have all the data collected in a central document, you can then provide AI with specific guidance to create a blog post. Otherwise if you simply ask AI to generate a post without clear directions, all you'll get is AI slop. I need to show him step-by-step on what to do. 

Although AI is extremely capable, technology without critical thinking is useless. If I gave you a computer but you don't know how to use a keyboard and mouse, what good is that computer to you? That's how I think about AI: you need to know how to use AI in order to really get value out of it. Otherwise it's just a fancy piece of technology that sits idle, much like my home gym equipment.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2243902 2025-12-11T17:51:19Z 2026-02-04T18:24:06Z Coffee

I usually drink a cup of French pressed coffee each morning, but today I decided to make myself a pour over coffee. It's incredible how much more flavor there is with a pour over. I like a pour over because it avoids overbrewing the coffee, which can lead to poor flavor. The trick to making pour over coffee is having the right amount of coffee grounds. If there's too little grounds you get a weak brew and vice versa. I'm not a coffee expert and eyeball all my brews, that said, I really enjoyed my morning coffee with a splash of lactose free milk.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2238944 2025-11-21T15:21:19Z 2026-02-04T18:24:12Z What is Strategy (ticker MSTR)?

With bitcoin testing a floor resistance at the $82K level, I figured I'd dive into the various preferred stocks that public investors like you and me can invest in. I ran a bunch of AI queries using this prompt: 

Explain all the strategy (ticker MSTR) public securities available for public investors to trade. Such as $STRK, $STRF, $STRD, $STRC, and $STRE and also $STRC. Explain what they are, how they are different from each other, how does the investment make money, and are the risks, etc. Think through the lens as a potential buyer of these securities and determine what you would need to know to make an informed buying decision.

Here are the results alongside the AI model (in no particular order):

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2211396 2025-07-17T20:04:39Z 2025-11-21T18:29:32Z Reboot

Starting today (July 17, 2025), this blog will refocus on writing about personal finance and stocking picks that I find interesting.

Today's stock is Alphabet (Google). I opened a new relatively large position of about 550 shares at an average price of $182 / share.

I'll write an in-depth article soon on why I like Alphabet, but as Soros used to say "Invest first, investigate later". 

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2160365 2024-12-21T00:34:52Z 2024-12-21T00:34:52Z Week 44: Last full week of the year


I'm going to take a break and think of a better / new way to share my performance. 

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2159106 2024-12-15T16:41:49Z 2024-12-15T16:41:49Z Week 43: Mostly a quiet week in the stock market

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2157738 2024-12-08T13:05:17Z 2024-12-08T13:05:17Z Week 42: The meaning of life is Bitcoin

For the first time in it's decade plus history, bitcoin surpassed $100,000 this year. Amazing!

Heads up that starting in 2025, I'm going to change this blog a bit. I want to write posts that has more substance rather than just posting my positions. Stay tuned. 

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2156445 2024-12-02T01:00:09Z 2024-12-02T01:00:17Z Week 41: Another great week for stocks (and bitcoin)

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2154700 2024-11-23T13:01:53Z 2024-11-23T13:02:17Z Week 40: Will Bitcoin reach $100K?
Bitcoin is on an incredible run and seems to have no end in sight. It's up 10% this week, which is on top of the prior week's incredible run-up.
]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2154259 2024-11-21T13:47:28Z 2024-11-21T13:47:28Z Microstrategy doubles down on Bitcoin

Since the election of Trump, Microstrategy has been on a regular cadence of issuing convertible bonds to purchase more bitcoin. I previously wrote about it here but didn't quite articulate it as well.

The current premise is that Microstrategy is:

  1. Issuing their convertible bonds to get USD 
  2. Using the USD to buy bitcoins
  3. Watching their stock price go up
  4. Realizing that the convertibles bonds are in-the-money that can convert into stock 
Then rinse and repeat 1-4.

Matt Levine, came to this conclusion here:

We talked last month about MicroStrategy’s plan here, which is pretty straightforward. MicroStrategy is essentially a pot of Bitcoins: Currently it owns 331,200 Bitcoins, and Bitcoin is trading at around $91,000, making MicroStrategy’s pot worth about $30 billion. It also runs an enterprise software business but that hardly seems relevant. MicroStrategy’s market capitalization is about $84 billion, meaning that it trades at well over a 150% premium to the value of its Bitcoins. So it can sell $1 worth of stock, buy $1 worth of Bitcoin, and add $2.50 of market capitalization. It can create value out of nowhere.

The natural response to discovering this magical phenomenon is to ask “well, okay, but how much of this can we do?” That was MicroStrategy’s response — it would absolutely be mine! — and it hasn’t found the limit yet. It did $4.6 billion of stock sales, and $4.6 billion of Bitcoin buying, last week. Its stock was up, Bitcoin was up, and its premium to Bitcoin also went up modestly.[1]

If you can issue stock for $1 and watch your stock price go up by $2.50, why would you stop?]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2153545 2024-11-18T00:39:57Z 2024-11-18T00:39:57Z Week 39: Bitcoin rips while the rest of the market loses steam

Bitcoin seems to have found it's footing at the ~$90k level. Stocks retreated Wednesday after Federal Reserve officials dampened expectations for a December rate cut, suggesting they need more economic data before committing to easing monetary policy. I'm thinking about buying Q2'25 earnings (July / August) puts on the Nasdaq on Monday to hedge for a weaker economy once Trump's economic plans gain more clarity.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2151693 2024-11-11T16:20:04Z 2024-11-11T16:22:16Z Bitcoin bulls are BACK!

Bitcoin has surpassed a new all-time record high of over $84,000:

This is on the heels of Trumps' presidential win and the expectation (hope?) that America will become the crypto capital of the world

Following the bitcoin bull run, Microstrategy today announced that it was acquired 27,200 BTC worth just over $2 billion:

I dug into what BTC Yield, because even as a finance pro, I haven't heard of this term before. Here's how Microstrategy explains it in today's press release:

"BTC Yield is a key performance indicator (“KPI”) that represents the percentage change period-to-period of the ratio between the Company’s bitcoin holdings and its Assumed Diluted Shares Outstanding. Assumed Diluted Shares Outstanding refers to the aggregate of the Company’s actual shares of common stock outstanding as of the end of the applicable period plus all additional shares that would result from the assumed conversion of all outstanding convertible notes, exercise of all outstanding stock option awards, and settlement of all outstanding restricted stock units and performance stock units. The Company uses BTC Yield as a KPI to help assess the performance of its strategy of acquiring bitcoin in a manner the Company believes is accretive to shareholders. The Company believes this KPI can be used to supplement an investor’s understanding of the Company’s decision to fund the purchase of bitcoin by issuing additional shares of its common stock or instruments convertible to common stock."

In other words, it's the delta between the BTC / DSO from two points in time -- see my scratch math here:


Thinking on this strategy for a moment, there are two scenarios in which this might play out:

Scenario 1: Bitcoin becomes the world currency reserve, alongside or supplanting the USD.
In this scenario, people no longer think about their local currency but their local currency relative to bitcoin. So, you go to your local grocery store to buy eggs and you're presented with two prices: your local currency and bitcoin (or maybe given the option to transact in bitcoin since bitcoin prices fluctuates). Microstrategy currently has over 1% of the total supply of bitcoin, and would be in a great position to put that capital to work to ostensibly make acquisition, share buybacks, etc. since bitcoin will be free to transact. This would be like a company today holding onto a massive supply of gold -- they have unlimited options on how to spend it. The benefit of being a Microstrategy shareholder is that, theoretically, you can increase you bitcoin holding as Microstrategy accumulates more bitcoin via issuing converting debt, which converts into shares (instead of being repaid). 

Scenario 2: Bitcoin for some reason goes to zero or well-below the conversion price in the convertible debt.
I won't speculate on the how or why of bitcoin, but let's suppose that bitcoin's price is well-below the conversion price of the convertible debt. This means that Microstrategy will need to repay the debt, since the debt will be out of the money. What happens then if Microstrategy doesn't have sufficient balance sheet cash? They can try to convert their bitcoin holdings into cash but the more they convert, the higher the chance of crashing the market (remember, they hold over 1% of total supply). In this scenario, it would seem that as a shareholder your recourse would be to wait for the bankruptcy process to play out and hope that you still have claim to any remaining asset. Similar to how FTX's bankruptcy process played out: equityholders actually had a net gain despite the bankruptcy because bitcoin's price had a run up so creditors were made whole.

If you're a bitcoin maxi, would you prefer to own Microstrategy or bitcoin? Option 1 has more upside because you can potentially gain more bitcoin indirectly when the company makes bitcoin purchases, which are funded by the convertible shares. But as you can see in option 2, if there's a market crash, and Microstrategy is unable to repay its debt then you're in trouble. 


The market has spoken and it seems investors like what they're seeing sending Microstrategy's shares to nearly $320 per share. 
]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2151175 2024-11-09T16:44:36Z 2024-11-09T16:44:36Z Week 38: Musk benefits greatly from Trump winning

As a Tesla shareholder, this has been an incredible week. Look at that gain! Just a week ago, I opened a LEAP (expires Dec 2025) with a strike price of $300. We've clearly surpassed that already and it's not even Dec 2024. Whoa. I've already 2x my Tesla purchase but because I sold calls, my upside is capped to $300 (though, I did gain $55 in option premium, so my breakeven is closer to $355).

With this week's impressive run-up in the broader market, let's see if it holds into next week. 

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2150036 2024-11-04T05:15:13Z 2024-11-04T05:15:13Z Week 37: Rough week for tech

After soaring the past few weeks, tech rebounded back to Earth. This week we saw a big reversion for Tesla and Microsoft, as earnings either met expectations or slightly missed. Thankfully, my Tesla covered call counter-balanced the negativity and put me back in the green. 

We're only a few days away from the Presidential Election. All eyes are on Tuesday November 5.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2149257 2024-10-31T13:23:59Z 2024-10-31T13:26:35Z Potential profitable trade by betting on Kamala

This isn't meant to get political so I just want to focus on the potential financial gains part. Also, this is not financial advice, do your own research, I am not your financial advisor, etc. 

Based on the latest public polling data as of today, it's essentially a coin toss on who wins the presidential election (note: the polls are based on the public vote outcome). Robinhood recently launched a feature where you can now bet on outcomes. I got access to it earlier this week and figured, why not try it out. Very simply to use, in fact, way simpler than buying a stock or option. Only 2 clicks to fields to confirm your quantity and price, then swipe up to place the bet.

Assuming there is in fact even odds for either candidate to win, it seems to me then that Robinhood's Kalama bet of $0.42 is a good trade. Again, based on today's polls, it's a 50/50 outcome, so the contract should cost $0.50 but it's currently trading at $0.42 -- a potential gain of $0.08 per contract. 

In terms of the actual payout, we'll find out on the night of November 5 which is less than a week away. I haven't been more interested in the presidential election than now (all thanks to Robinhood!). 

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2148101 2024-10-26T12:26:26Z 2024-10-26T12:26:26Z Week 36: TSLA powers ahead!

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2147931 2024-10-25T16:29:17Z 2024-10-25T16:29:18Z Tesla covered call

This is not financial advice. Do your own research. Consult a financial advisor. I am not your financial advisor.

I opened an options position today by selling 1 call with a strike price of $300 and expiration date in Dec 2025 (more than a year from now). The option premium was $51 when TSLA's current price is $267. At almost 20% upside, this felt like a good low risk trade.

In all of Tesla's history, it has traded above $300 only for a short period of time. There's a chance I could get assigned but given the upside and history, it seems unlikely. Even if I do get assigned at $300, with the options premium and strike price I would make 1.9x my money which is pretty good for a 2 year hold. With this week's runup, thanks to a great earnings call, I think the stock is temporarily overbought so I want to monetize some of that euphoria. That being said, I do plan on holding Tesla for at least a decade.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2146675 2024-10-20T13:56:30Z 2024-10-20T13:56:30Z Week 35: BTC blasts ahead!

]]>