tag:mrzod.com,2013:/posts Tickers & Timepieces 2026-08-28T20:08:42Z tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2325046 2026-08-28T20:08:40Z 2026-08-28T20:08:42Z Incredible quote on self-improvement ]]> tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2325020 2026-08-28T18:20:23Z 2026-08-28T18:20:25Z Perfect fit

The GoRuck GR2 with front pocket fits perfect under the seat.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2324464 2026-08-27T02:58:42Z 2026-08-27T02:58:43Z Different watches for different people

Blancpain, in honor of the 50th anniversary of the Bathyscaphe, released a limited edition model this week. Only 300 examples were produced and the price tag is approx. $18,000.

I like the design and all, but it just doesn't speak to me.

However, I enjoyed reading people's feedback here. Already two people posted their new allocation. I'm very happy for them.

Just let everyone has a favorite dish or fruit, watches are as unique as the person who wears them.

Wear your watch in good health!

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2323982 2026-08-25T21:47:34Z 2026-08-25T21:47:34Z The 5320 is haunting me

I can't stop thinking about the 5320. I'm seriously considering it as my next watch when my business achieves a revenue milestone of $1mm. I love setting goals for myself and can't wait to celebrate owning it. 

I've watched countless YouTube videos (thank you Tim Mosso!) learning all about the watch. LET'S GO!!!

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2322712 2026-08-21T23:05:00Z 2026-08-21T23:09:01Z New grail: Patek 5320

On my way to a meeting, I stopped by a jewelry and watch shop in Burlingame. The sales associate was super warm and helpful. I told her that I didn't plan to drop by but the Patek logo on the glass display caught my eye, and while wearing the 5212, I wanted to peek at what they have in stock. 

After waiting a few seconds for the store's glass door to open (there was a cop car parked right across), I was ushered in. As expected, there weren't many Pateks in the display cases, but before leaving, the SA took me over to the pre-owned section. The 5320 caught my eye. I haven't seen a Patek like that before; it had everything that I could possibly want:

  • Large, lumed numerals 
  • Distinguishable syringe hands (I don't like the Speedmaster's thin hands nor the Seamaster's skeleton hands)
  • Grand complications: moonphase, night / day indicator, day / date / month, leap year counter (I'm a sucker for complications)
  • Beautiful alligator leather strap
  • Deployant
  • Precious metal (all my watches today are in stainless steel, and I'd love to get one in gold)

The retail price is about $110K which is way beyond my current means. BUT, the secondary market has the creme dial, which is my preference, for under $60K. For half off, this is -- in my snobby opinion, because no one needs a Patek -- an absolute bargain!

When I have a monetary or business milestone to celebrate, this is what I'm getting. One can only dream.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2320887 2026-08-16T16:25:33Z 2026-08-16T16:25:34Z First 10 mile run
I really pushed myself in the back half because I realized that I was going to be late getting home to take my kids to swim class. 

Listening to music vs podcast (Don Valentine lecturing at Stanford nonetheless) made a world of a difference in pacing. 


Here’s the lecture in case you’re interested:

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2320484 2026-08-15T04:41:03Z 2026-08-15T04:41:04Z How Tudor watches are made (video)
]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2320079 2026-08-14T03:37:25Z 2026-08-14T03:37:26Z Thrive’s letter to investors Letter to Thrive Capital Investors:

In Thrive’s history, I have never written a formal investor letter. This year, because we will not be together for an Investor Day, I wanted to write to you directly. We are deeply grateful for your trust, and we feel a profound responsibility to continue earning it through our work.

The principles that have guided Thrive since inception remain the same. What has changed is the world around us. I want to use this letter to share what we are seeing, how we are applying our strategy to this moment, and why the same principles that brought Thrive here continue to shape the work ahead.

Our Strategy

Thrive began with a simple but unconventional idea. We believed an investment firm could be opportunistic across stage, sector, and geography, while remaining deeply concentrated in a small number of people and ideas. We wanted to build a firm with the freedom to follow its curiosity wherever the best opportunities emerged, and the discipline to act only when that curiosity became conviction.

We have never believed that the traditional boundaries of our industry needed to define us, and we remain grateful to the partners who believed in this approach long before it was obvious. Our strategy has never been to be different for its own sake. Rather, the strategy has been, and always will be, to think from first principles about what founders need, where the best opportunities are emerging, and how we can build Thrive to concentrate our time, capital, and energy on the people and ideas we believe in most.

We have long believed that a small number of exceptional companies create a disproportionate amount of value and can compound their advantages for far longer than the market expects. We also believe that being a meaningful partner requires time, context, and trust. You cannot know a company deeply from a distance. You cannot be a true partner in difficult moments without the time and context that concentration requires. That belief shaped the portfolio. It also shaped the firm.

Since our founding, the scale of Thrive has changed, but the strategy and ethos of the firm have not. In every way, scale raises the standard. Today, Thrive manages more than $65 billion, more than half of which is driven by investment gains. But AUM will never be the product. We view it as a reflection of trust earned over a long period of time. The product of Thrive is the quality of our judgment, the depth of our partnership, the discipline of our process, and the culture of the team making decisions every day.

Culture is a word that is easy to overuse and hard to define. For us, it has always meant a small number of simple things taken seriously.

We try to listen more than we talk. We try to say “I don’t know” when we do not know. We try to be intellectually honest even when the truth is uncomfortable. We try to be ambitious while remaining self-aware. We try to be kind without being weak. We try to be tough without becoming callous. Gratitude without ambition can become nostalgia. Ambition without gratitude can become entitlement. We need both. We try to focus on our craft rather than the noise around us.

This requires humility. It requires recognizing that the most important insight may come from the least experienced person in the room. It is not possible to always make the right decision, but it is possible for us to always have the right conversations. Above all, we understand that we will never be a finished product, either as a firm or as individuals. Excellence is not something we arrive at. It is the work itself.

While I am proud of how far Thrive has come, and thankful for all we have built together, I am even more aware of how far we have to go. That tension has always been important to us as it has been part of the ethos of the firm from day one. We never confuse progress with arrival; as soon as we summit a mountain, we immediately look for the next climb.

We remain early in our journey and a small percentage of our full potential. That reality is both humbling and motivating.

Our Perspective

The clarity of our thinking matters more today because the opportunity before us is so significant. There are moments in technology when progress feels linear, and moments when it begins to compound in ways that are difficult to understand in real time. Today feels like one of those exponential moments. Ideas that would have represented major breakthroughs only a short time ago now appear almost weekly. The pace of technological and scientific progress requires us to keep updating our understanding of what is possible, while remaining disciplined about where enduring value will accrue.

Artificial intelligence is the most important technology paradigm of our lifetimes.

The internet democratized access to information. AI has the potential to democratize access to intelligence. If that happens, the implications could be extraordinary. Every person, company, and institution may eventually have access to capabilities that were previously unavailable or unimaginable. Workflows will change. Products will change. Cost structures will change. Entire industries will be rebuilt, and the societal implications of both the magnitude and rate of change are likely to be profound.

Our work with OpenAI has given us a close view of how quickly these models are becoming useful in the real world. The most important lesson is not any single benchmark or release. It is the rate of improvement. Systems are beginning to operate with greater autonomy, and the amount of work a model can complete in one uninterrupted effort is expanding quickly. For us, the conclusion is not simply that AI will create value. It is that we must be increasingly precise about where value will be captured, and where it will compound over time.

One area we believe durable value will be created is in the infrastructure required for AI to scale: compute, power, networking, memory, advanced manufacturing, and the supply chains that enable models to be deployed at scale. As AI adoption grows, these inputs become increasingly important, and in some cases, increasingly scarce. These constraints will help determine the pace at which the shift occurs.

It is difficult to overstate the magnitude of the opportunity. It would also be a grave error in our minds to let excitement weaken our investment discipline. In moments of euphoria, investors tend to convince themselves that second- and third-tier assets are actually first-tier. The story becomes so powerful that people stop making distinctions. Capital flows toward the theme rather than the company. Markets begin to reward proximity to the future rather than evidence of enduring quality. Within Silicon Valley in particular, the industry can become fixated on hyper-incremental technological turns rather than where the technology ultimately leads.

We have seen this before, and we will see it again. Technological optimism and investment discipline are not opposites. In fact, the more optimistic we are about the size of a paradigm shift, the more disciplined we must be about where value will be captured. Not every company exposed to an important theme becomes important. Not every company using new technology becomes enduring. Not every fast-growing business is exceptional. And not every exceptional company is a great investment at every price. Our responsibility is to maintain those distinctions.

We are independent because markets move between fear and enthusiasm, and neither is a substitute for judgment. In difficult moments, independence can mean moving toward an exceptional company while others move away. In euphoric moments, it can mean remaining patient while activity around us accelerates, knowing there will be future opportunities to partner with many of these same exceptional businesses but with a more attractive risk/reward calculus. It is only because of repeated lessons throughout Thrive’s history that we have learned the highest-quality assets compound over very long arcs and, as such, patience, discipline, and conviction must sit together in equal measure.

As we look at the world today, we increasingly organize our opportunity set across four categories:

Emerging Technologies: These are businesses creating the building blocks of both new industries and new paradigms which will drive exponential change. Companies such as OpenAI, SpaceX, and Isomorphic represent what we believe are among the most important technology platforms being built anywhere in the world. They are difficult, deeply ambitious, capital-intensive, and, early on, very often misunderstood. We do not view these as reasons to avoid these businesses, and in many cases, they are part of what makes them important and defensible.

Infrastructure and Applications of Emerging Technologies: These are businesses such as Stripe, Databricks, Anduril, and others whose products, data, distribution, and customer relationships can position them to be more valuable in an AI-first world. Some will underpin the infrastructure layer. Some will create domain-specific intelligence. Some will apply AI to existing workflows in ways that fundamentally improve the customer experience. The common thread is that they are deeply advantaged by technology paradigm shifts.

Traditional Industries to be Transformed by Emerging Technologies: This is the work of Thrive Holdings.

Since seeing the preview of ChatGPT in 2022, we have believed that AI would transform large, legacy industries that collectively represent several trillion dollars of enterprise value. But unlike many of our peers, our conviction was not only that these industries would be disrupted from the outside in but also that many would be transformed from the inside out.

The most important ingredients for applied AI are often proprietary data, domain expertise, workflow ownership, and the ability to implement change in real-world operating environments. Existing businesses often have these ingredients, but they do not always have the technology, talent, urgency, or ownership structure required to leverage them fully. That is why we started Thrive Holdings.

Through Holdings, we have acquired more than 70 businesses that serve tens of thousands of customers. We now have a dedicated team of 35 engineers and operators working alongside the operators inside these businesses. On our accounting platform, we have built custom agents that have achieved 98% accuracy and reduced preparation times by up to 30% for tax returns. At our IT services firm, triage and resolution agents have reduced ticket completion time by 60% and are resolving 50% of all tickets end-to-end.

We are proud of this scale and early impact. What is most exciting at Holdings is the progress happening inside the businesses themselves. In partnership with OpenAI, we are building increasingly capable custom models and proprietary systems that can change how these companies operate

This work has also taught us that AI transformation is not only a model-layer problem. Models matter enormously. But real-world transformation requires product thinking, engineering, workflow design, incentives, training, and organizational change. It requires people who understand the business and people who understand the technology working together in a very deep way. In many ways, change management is the product. That is hard. It is also why the opportunity exists. Assets Counterpositioned to Transformation: This is the work of Thrive Eternal.

Most of our time is spent thinking about the first-order consequences of AI. What becomes more efficient? What becomes cheaper? What becomes automated? What new products become possible? But there will also be second- and third-order consequences. In a world of abundant intelligence, certain scarce human experiences may matter more. In a world of fragmented distribution, trusted institutions may matter more. In a world where content and software become easier to create, assets rooted in identity, culture, community, history, and physical experience may become more valuable.

Eternal was created to invest in a small number of these assets and steward them over very long periods of time. The objective is not to buy, optimize, and sell. This distinction is very important. We intentionally chose a permanent capital structure because the assets we want to own deserve a time horizon measured in decades. Each of these categories is distinct, yet the philosophy behind them is the same, and the strategic connectivity among them is foundational to the firm’s strategy.

The frontier companies help us understand where technology is going before it becomes obvious. That perspective makes us better investors in both the public and private markets, where we can identify the companies best positioned to benefit from new technology paradigms long before those advantages are fully reflected in their businesses or valuations. It also makes us better partners to the exceptional founders building the infrastructure and applications that bring these technologies into the real economy.

Through Thrive Holdings, we learn what it actually takes to transform established businesses from the inside out, giving us hard-earned operating insights. And through Eternal, we better understand the characteristics that enable businesses to retain their relevance and compound through periods of significant change. That perspective strengthens our judgment around durability and long-term value creation across the firm.

At the center of all of this is a simple belief: our job is to partner with the most talented and ambitious entrepreneurs in the world, develop a deep understanding of both technology and its practical implications, and build an organization where every lesson compounds across every strategy. Over time, we believe that this shared knowledge and perspective will become one of Thrive’s most enduring competitive advantages.

Our Work

At the early stage, we remain focused on maintaining close contact with the frontier. Early-stage investing is the largest universe of opportunity and the clearest way to understand how the next generation of founders is thinking. We have been fortunate to partner with companies such as Cursor, OpenEvidence, and Physical Intelligence, which are helping define progress at the model, application, and infrastructure layers. We expect to continue investing at our historical pace through the remainder of the year, with a focus on emerging technologies, AI applications, and infrastructure. At the growth stage, we have built positions in existing growth-stage portfolio companies we have admired for a long time, including Anduril, Isomorphic Labs, Stripe, and OpenAI. We are humbled that founders increasingly seek Thrive as a lead partner. We will never take that for granted. Access is earned through judgment, work, and the quality of partnership after the investment is made. When Thrive leads an investment, we want that decision to communicate a deep belief in the quality of the team, the importance of the product, and the magnitude of the opportunity.

We are also deepening our work in public markets. Historically, Thrive has made a small number of public market investments when we believed a business was meaningfully misunderstood. Today, we believe that understanding the most important public technology companies is increasingly essential to our work across the firm. Many of our growth-stage companies compete with, partner with, or become the next generation of public technology companies. The more precise our understanding of public markets, the better our judgment will be in private markets. Our targeted public market work is an extension of our desire to continuously learn, to sharpen our collective judgment, and to improve our ability to evaluate quality irrespective of where it exists.

Our Performance

We know that you have entrusted us with capital that supports universities, hospitals, foundations, families, countries and institutions whose work extends far beyond our own. We never forget who we work for. When we do well, the causes and people you support do well too.

We are ultimately measured by the returns that we generate. That is appropriate. But returns are outputs. If we become too focused on the outputs, we will lose the very things that have enabled those outputs to exist. The inputs are the people, culture, process, data, discipline, judgment, and trust.

This September will mark fifteen years since Thrive raised its first institutional fund. Since inception, Thrive funds have compounded capital at an aggregate gross IRR of 41% and an aggregate net IRR of 33%. Each of Thrive II to Thrive X ranks in the top quartile of its applicable benchmark based on net TVPI and approximately one-third of those funds rank in the top 5% on this metric. Over the last 12 months, we have generated more than $1B of liquidity and believe there may be an opportunity for billions of dollars in additional liquidity in the coming quarters.

The reason to include these numbers is not to celebrate them, but to explain what produced them. A small number of decisions have mattered disproportionately. Each investment has taught us different lessons. Some taught us the importance of acting before something is obvious. Some taught us the value of concentration. Some taught us that the best founders can navigate periods when the rest of the world loses conviction. Some taught us that being early is less important than being right, and staying committed.

We have also made our share of mistakes. We have invested in companies that did not become what we hoped, and we have passed on companies that became extraordinary. We have underestimated products, founders, and markets. The only way to improve is to be honest about these errors of judgment and to make sure that every success and every failure becomes a data point that makes the firm better.

Our Team

We have always believed in the power of a small team. Small teams require trust, clarity, and ownership. They also require exceptionally high standards. Each person at Thrive, regardless of function, must make the firm better. We have often used the concept of an artist colony internally because we believe the best people always want to be surrounded by others who care deeply about their craft. That has been true not only on the investment team, but also across portfolio impact, finance, legal, compliance, investor relations, data, product, and engineering.

This commitment to individual and collective excellence is the source of our ability to perform for our founders and our limited partners.

Across Thrive, our teams are operating at a very high level. The portfolio impact team is helping founders diagnose the most important problems in their businesses and reason from first principles toward the right answers. Our product, engineering, and data teams now represent approximately 10% of headcount and are reimagining how Thrive itself operates. We are building tools for the investment team, investor relations, diligence, portfolio monitoring, knowledge management, and internal workflows. These internal AI tools are saving thousands of hours of work per year and critically raising the standard for what each individual and each team can accomplish.

We have always viewed Thrive as a company that happens to invest in and build other companies. In 2023, in order to think about how to best position Thrive strategically, we brought on a select group of strategic shareholders whose experience and global perspective have been invaluable to building Thrive and our portfolio companies, including Bob Iger, Henry Kravis, Mukesh Ambani, Jorge Paulo Lemann, Alexandre Van Damme, and Xavier Niel.

As Thrive has continued to evolve, some of our closest partners have expressed interest in supporting Thrive in its broadest sense. We are therefore pursuing a similarly sized minority investment from our original shareholder group, together with a small number of new institutional partners. Beyond providing additional capital to support our long-term ambitions at Thrive, these partners bring experience, perspective, and strategic counsel that will help us continue building across each of our platforms for decades to come. Our intention would be to retain the capital on our balance sheet in order to continue investing strategically in Thrive.

Across every dimension of team building and strategic positioning, we are asking the same question of ourselves that we ask of the companies with whom we partner: if we were building Thrive today, with the tools and resources now available, how would we build it? There should be no function and no process at Thrive that is protected simply because it is familiar. We need to keep shipping. We need to keep learning. We need to keep evolving and be open to new opportunities. We need to keep improving the product we deliver to founders and limited partners.

Our Commitment

Much has changed since we started Thrive. Much more will change in the years ahead. But the essence of who we are has always stayed the same.

We must continue to think independently.

We must continue to be ambitious.

We must continue to be concentrated in people and ideas, as quality is scarce.

We must continue to support founders in both their most exciting and most difficult moments.

We must continue to be disciplined when others are euphoric, convicted when others are afraid.

We must continue to be humble, as seeking external validation can distort judgment. Praise and criticism often arrive with the same lack of precision, and neither should change who we are.

We must continue to earn your trust every day.

I do not know exactly what the world will look like ten years from now. Anyone who convinces themselves that they can predict the future with certainty is not being honest. I do know that the work ahead will, at the very least, demand the same values, principles, and approach that brought us here.

We feel extraordinarily fortunate to be building during a period of such profound innovation. I believe it is in moments of extraordinary change that Thrive is able to operate at the highest possible level as our small team and generalist mandate are purpose-built to identify and execute on the most compelling opportunities.

We are grateful to the founders who allow us to be by their side. I am grateful to my colleagues at Thrive whose commitment to our work inspires me every day. And we are grateful to you for your trust, partnership, and support.

We believe the opportunity ahead is larger than anything we have seen before, and we deeply believe that Thrive today is only a fraction of what it can become.

yours, Josh

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2317589 2026-08-07T17:33:06Z 2026-08-07T19:50:42Z Blast from the past

I recently became aware that the Rolex warranty paper includes the address of the buyer. Not sure if modern Rolexes still continue this tradition because I don't own a modern model.

On Reddit, someone shared a for sale posting of a Submariner from 1990. So I looked up my own watch and, lo and behold, the address from the mid 80's is there. After asking ChatGPT for the translated address, I put it into Google Maps and found the home that bought my watch more than 40 years ago. Neat little piece of history.

Separately, ChatGPT informed me that the Plaza Accord was signed around that time which makes this watch extra special. Following the agreement, the Japanese economy boomed and made their local population very wealthy. 


]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2316657 2026-08-04T18:00:27Z 2026-08-04T18:00:27Z Small incentive, big outcome

I think guac is like a $2 add-on, but seeing this pop up in my app made me crave Chipotle for lunch today. Funny how that small incentive can drive user behavior.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2316413 2026-08-04T00:23:48Z 2026-08-04T14:18:53Z Crafter Blue strap on a Rolex Submariner (16800)

Here’s the freshly installed strap on my Submariner.

Super easy to install. Here’s what I did:

  1. Removed the metal bracelet from the watch
  2. Reused the spring bars since they seemed to be thicker than the Crafter Blue spring bars.

    Note: I read somewhere that using a thinner spring bar instead of the appropriate thickness can enlarge the pin hole over time. So if you need extra spring bars, make sure you get the right ones!

     
  3. Used my thumbnails to reinstall the spring bars back into the watch

Pro tip: After installing the strap, make sure you can visually see the spring bars poking through the holes. The 16800 has drilled lugs, so you can do this. Also, give the straps a tug to ensure the strap is seated firmly. 

Initial impressions:

  • This is exactly what I wanted and the price is very reasonable for $60
  • Strap sits flush against the case so there’s no gaps whatsoever 
  • I read one review that the bezel gets stuck when the strap is installed, but that’s not my experience. My bezel works the same as before and turns without any strap friction
  • The rubber is quite thick. So if you’re seeking a thin strap, this is not it. I prefer this thicker rubber as it feels more premium
  • The extra strap holes is excellent. I have a 6.25” wrist and I use the 4th last hole. With a sweaty wrist, I can go up a notch for some extra room
  • Overall: I’m highly satisfied and would buy this again. It’s a surprise to me that there aren’t that many Crafter Blue reviews so hopefully my review helps others considering getting one for themselves

PS: Even though the company itself is Hong Kong-based, my package was shipped from the East Coast to California.
]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2316322 2026-08-03T20:28:29Z 2026-08-03T20:28:30Z AVC MBA Mondays

I couldn't find an easy to browse archive of Fred Wilson's MBA Mondays, so here it is:

2019

August 1, 2019 — Employee Equity: How Much?


2018

December 3, 2018 — Litigation

April 17, 2018 — The Employee Equity Project


2017

March 13, 2017 — From The Archives: Convertible Debt

February 9, 2017 — From The Archives: Retaining Your Team

January 23, 2017 — From The Archives: Turning Your Team


2014

March 13, 2014 — The Bubble Question


2013

December 16, 2013 — Taking To Dos and Moving Up The Y Axis

November 20, 2013 — Employee Equity

October 27, 2013 — Profitless Prosperity

September 16, 2013 — Exit Interviews

August 19, 2013 — MBA Mondays: When Its Not Your Team

August 15, 2013 — The Similarities Between Building and Scaling a Product and a Company

August 12, 2013 — MBA Mondays: Turning Your Team

August 5, 2013 — Focus

August 1, 2013 — A Table Of Contents for MBA Mondays

July 8, 2013 — Startup Management

July 1, 2013 — From The MBA Mondays Archive

June 17, 2013 — What Is Strategy?

June 3, 2013 — MBA Mondays: Sales Leads On A Small Budget

June 2, 2013 — Product > Strategy > Business Model

May 20, 2013 — Success Has A Thousand Fathers

May 13, 2013 — You Can Do Too Much Due Diligence

May 6, 2013 — Great Entrepreneurs Will Listen To You But Will Follow Their Own Instincts

April 29, 2013 — Because It's Standard

April 22, 2013 — You Are Working Too Hard And Not Getting Anywhere

April 15, 2013 — Tenacity And Persistence Pays Off

April 8, 2013 — Don't Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste

March 25, 2013 — Revenue Traction Doesn't Mean Product Market Fit

March 4, 2013 — Whither MBA Mondays?

February 18, 2013 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models - Gaming

February 11, 2013 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models - Mobile

February 4, 2013 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models - Data

January 28, 2013 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models - Licensing

January 21, 2013 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models - Transaction Processing

January 16, 2013 — Guest Post: Startup Business Development 101

January 14, 2013 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models - Peer to Peer

January 7, 2013 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models - Subscriptions


2012

December 24, 2012 — No MBA Mondays This Week or Next

December 17, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models - Commerce

December 10, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models - Advertising

December 3, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models

November 27, 2012 — MBA Mondays: The Revenue Model Hackpad, Take Two

November 26, 2012 — MBA Mondays: The Revenue Model Hackpad

November 19, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Revenue Models

November 12, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Next Topics

November 5, 2012 — MBA Mondays: One More Thing On Sustainability Before We Move On

October 29, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Sustainability Class Wrapup

October 22, 2012 — How To Be In Business Forever: Week Four

October 15, 2012 — How To Be In Business Forever: Week Three

October 8, 2012 — How To Be In Business Forever: Week Two

October 1, 2012 — How To Be In Business Forever: A Lesson In Sustainability

September 24, 2012 — MBA Mondays From The Archive: Analyzing Financial Statements

September 17, 2012 — MBA Mondays From The Archives: Cash Flow

September 10, 2012 — MBA Mondays From The Archives: The Balance Sheet

September 3, 2012 — MBA Mondays From The Archives: The Profit and Loss Statement

August 27, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Accounting From The Archives

August 20, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Guest Post From Dr. Dana Ardi

August 13, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Guest Post From Scott Kurnit

August 7, 2012 — How to Be in Business Forever: A Class On Sustainability

August 6, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Guest Post From Susan Loh

July 30, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Guest Post From Chad Dickerson

July 23, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Guest Post From Angela Baldonero

July 16, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Guest Post From Donna White

July 9, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Leveraging Your Partners To Grow And Develop Your Team

July 2, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Asking An Employee To Leave The Company

June 25, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Retaining Your Employees

June 11, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Best Hiring Practices

June 4, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Optimal Headcount At Various Stages

May 28, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Where To Find Strong Talent

May 27, 2012 — Twilio’s Nine Things

May 21, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Culture And Fit

May 14, 2012 — MBA Mondays Series: People

May 7, 2012 — MBA Mondays Series: Human Capital

April 30, 2012 — MBA Mondays: Where To Go Next?

April 23, 2012 — The Board Of Directors: Guest Post From Matt Blumberg

April 19, 2012 — MBA Mondays Live: Employee Equity - Archive and Feedback

April 16, 2012 — The Board of Directors: Guest Post From Scott Kurnit

April 15, 2012 — MBA Mondays Live: Employee Equity

April 9, 2012 — The Board Of Directors: Board Committees

April 2, 2012 — The Board Of Directors: Board Meetings

March 26, 2012 — The Board Of Directors: Board Chemistry

March 19, 2012 — The Board Of Directors - The Board Chair

March 17, 2012 — Announcing MBA Mondays Live

March 12, 2012 — The Board Of Directors - Selecting, Electing & Evolving

March 5, 2012 — The Board Of Directors: Role and Responsibilities

February 27, 2012 — MBA Mondays Series: The Board Of Directors

February 20, 2012 — The Management Team - Guest Post By Jerry Colonna

February 13, 2012 — The Management Team - Guest Post From Joel Spolsky

February 6, 2012 — The Management Team - Guest Post From Phil Sugar

January 30, 2012 — The Management Team - Guest Post From JLM

January 23, 2012 — The Management Team - Guest Post From Matt Blumberg

January 16, 2012 — The Management Team - While Building The Business

January 9, 2012 — The Management Team - While Building Usage

January 2, 2012 — The Management Team - While Building Product


2011

December 26, 2011 — Scaling The Management Team

December 19, 2011 — How Much To Burn While Building Product

December 12, 2011 — Burn Rates: How Much?

December 5, 2011 — Burn Rate

November 21, 2011 — Sustainability

November 14, 2011 — Business Arcanery: Going Concern

November 7, 2011 — A New MBA Mondays Series: Business Arcanery

October 31, 2011 — VP Engineering Vs CTO

October 24, 2011 — VP Finance vs CFO

October 17, 2011 — Revenue Based Financing

October 10, 2011 — Liquidation Analysis (Continued)

October 3, 2011 — Liquidation Analysis

September 26, 2011 — MBA Mondays: Cap Tables

September 19, 2011 — Audio MBA Mondays

September 12, 2011 — EBITDA

September 5, 2011 — Determining Valuation Multiples

August 29, 2011 — Pricing A Follow-On Venture Investment

August 22, 2011 — Financing Options: Working Capital Financing

August 15, 2011 — Financing Options: Bridge Loans

August 8, 2011 — Financing Options: Capital Equipment Loans and Leases

July 25, 2011 — Financings Options: Venture Debt

July 18, 2011 — Financing Options: Preferred Stock

July 11, 2011 — Financing Options: Convertible Debt

June 27, 2011 — Financing Options: Vendor Financing

June 20, 2011 — Financing Options: Customers

June 13, 2011 — Financing Options: Government Grants

June 6, 2011 — Financing Options: Contests/Prizes/Accelerator Programs

May 30, 2011 — Financing Options: Friends and Family

May 23, 2011 — Financing Options For Startups

May 18, 2011 — Sizing Option Pools In Connection With Financings

May 16, 2011 — Financing Options For Small Tech Companies

May 9, 2011 — Competition - The Pros and Cons

May 2, 2011 — Ordinary Income vs Capital Gains

April 25, 2011 — LTV > CPA

April 18, 2011 — Margins (continued)

April 11, 2011 — Margins

April 7, 2011 — 360 Reviews

April 4, 2011 — M&A Issues: Price

March 28, 2011 — No MBA Mondays Today

March 21, 2011 — M&A Issues: Consideration

March 14, 2011 — M&A Issues: Timing

February 28, 2011 — M&A Issues: Reps, Warranties, Indemnities, and Escrows

February 21, 2011 — M&A Issues: Breakup Fees

February 16, 2011 — MBA Tuesday

February 14, 2011 — M&A Issues: Governmental Approvals

February 9, 2011 — What A Management Team Does

February 7, 2011 — M&A Issues: The Stay Package

February 1, 2011 — MBA Mondays Everywhere

January 31, 2011 — M&A Issues: The Integration Plan

January 24, 2011 — M&A Case Studies: Feedburner

January 17, 2011 — M&A Case Studies: WhatCounts Sale Process

January 10, 2011 — M&A Case Studies: WhatCounts

January 3, 2011 — M&A Case Studies: ChiliSoft


2010

December 27, 2010 — Selling Your Company

December 23, 2010 — The MBA Mondays Curriculum

December 20, 2010 — Buying and Selling Assets

December 6, 2010 — M&A Fundamentals

November 29, 2010 — Acquisition Finance

November 22, 2010 — Employee Equity: How Much?

November 15, 2010 — Employee Equity: Vesting

November 8, 2010 — Employee Equity: Restricted Stock and RSUs

November 1, 2010 — Employee Equity: The Option Strike Price

October 25, 2010 — Employee Equity: The Liquidation Overhang

October 18, 2010 — Employee Equity: Options

October 11, 2010 — Employee Equity: Appreciation

October 4, 2010 — Employee Equity: Dilution

September 27, 2010 — Employee Equity

September 20, 2010 — Outsourcing vs Offshoring

September 13, 2010 — Outsourcing

September 6, 2010 — What A CEO Does (continued)

August 30, 2010 — What A CEO Does

August 23, 2010 — Commission Plans

August 16, 2010 — Bookings vs Revenues vs Collections

August 9, 2010 — Enterprise Value and Market Value

August 2, 2010 — Off Balance Sheet Liabilities

July 26, 2010 — Sunk Costs

July 19, 2010 — Opportunity Costs

July 12, 2010 — Purchasing Power Parity

July 5, 2010 — Currency Risk In A Business

June 28, 2010 — Hedging

June 21, 2010 — Diversification

June 14, 2010 — Risk And Return

June 7, 2010 — Forecasting

May 31, 2010 — Budgeting In A Large Company

May 24, 2010 — Budgeting In A Growing Company

May 10, 2010 — Budgeting In A Small Early Stage Company

May 3, 2010 — Scenarios

April 26, 2010 — Projections, Budgeting and Forecasting

April 19, 2010 — Price: Why Lower Isn't Always Better

April 12, 2010 — Key Business Metrics

April 5, 2010 — Analyzing Financial Statements

March 29, 2010 — Cash Flow

March 22, 2010 — The Balance Sheet

March 15, 2010 — The Profit and Loss Statement

March 8, 2010 — Accounting

March 1, 2010 — Piercing The Corporate Veil

February 22, 2010 — Corporate Entities

February 15, 2010 — Compounding Interest

February 8, 2010 — The Time Value Of Money

February 1, 2010 — The Present Value Of Future Cash Flows

January 25, 2010 — How To Calculate A Return On Investment


]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2315654 2026-08-01T16:36:03Z 2026-08-01T16:36:11Z Cardio consistency

I've been training since April for a half marathon in October. I haven't trained since my sprint triathlon in September 2025, so it was somewhat of a cold-start. At first, I could barely run 1 mile, then over the weeks did 3 miles, and now today, I wrapped up 5.5 miles and felt like I could have run another 2-3 miles. 

The human body is an impressive piece of machinery. It might be impossible (difficult?) to run 5.5 miles without training but over time, the body can adapt, improve and strengthen to accomplish almost anything. I like this feeling of self-improvement because it gives me hope that when faced with adversity, it's just a matter of surviving and trying again and again. Don't ever give up. With enough time, anything is possible.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2315297 2026-07-31T18:36:05Z 2026-07-31T18:36:05Z GoRuck shirts

GoRuck has their Christmas in July special. I purchased a hoodie a few weeks ago when they (accidently?) had a 30% off coupon that stacked with the sale. Really liked the thinness of the hoodie, and it felt quite durable. So last week I placed an order for additional long sleeve and another hoodie in a different color. 

Reading about the GoRuck history and how Jason started it during business school following his experience in the special forces is such an inspirational story. He's declined PE money and desires to keep GoRuck private for as long as possible. 

I'm a happy customer for more than a decade. I encourage my readers to check them out and see if anything catches your eye.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2314204 2026-07-28T18:01:00Z 2026-07-28T18:01:41Z Crafter Blue Watch Strap

The bracelet to my 40 year old Submariner 16800 is in good condition but the flap opposite of the flip-lock keeps snagging onto things. It's not as bad as some of the other subs I've seen where the flap is literally loose. But it's annoying enough for me to want to replace the bracelet with something else. A new 93150 bracelet costs about $1,250 according to ChatGPT. I'm not prepared to spend that much to replace the entire bracelet, so I decided to look into a rubber strap instead. Having it repaired didn't seem like a good option yet but I may go down this path once I find a reliable watch repair shop. 

I spent a couple of weeks doing research both desktop and with ChatGPT. The main suggestions were Rubber B and Everest, but at approx. $300 a piece those straps are way outside of my budget. I really like the Rubber B Dream Strap which has pin holes that are lined up so you can find the perfect fit throughout the year. Maybe I'll pick up for my birthday or a special occasion. 

ChatGPT suggested a brand I've never heard of called Crafter Blue. I did some research on the brand and it seems they got their start from making rubber straps for Seiko dive watches. Over the past few years they added Rolex rubber straps that are supposedly molded to the case for a tight fit. I placed an order last week and used a promotion code to bring it down to $60 (15% off). The strap shipped recently, so I should hopefully get it within a week or so. The company is based in Hong Kong but the strap was shipped from Seattle; no customs duty, yay! 

Review to come once I've spent time with the strap.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2288529 2026-05-11T15:10:46Z 2026-05-11T15:10:46Z A quiet mind, a slow morning

As I was walking back home after dropping my daughter to school, I saw one of our new neighbors now has a second, smaller, mini scooter. They moved in with a baby infant and a 4 year old. Now that baby can ride a scooter. Life keeps going, no matter how busy work gets. Need to stop and appreciate life once in a while.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2285209 2026-04-30T19:22:14Z 2026-04-30T19:24:14Z Sometimes you get lucky

Less than a year ago, I shared that this blog would go through a reboot switching from writing about crypto to personal financing. Well, it seems that post was quite prescient: 

Today's stock is Alphabet (Google). I opened a new relatively large position of about 550 shares at an average price of $182 / share.

I'll write an in-depth article soon on why I like Alphabet, but as Soros used to say "Invest first, investigate later". 

Less than a year later, that position has more than doubled and I have yet to write an in-depth article about why I like Alphabet. Well, let me provide a short summary of why I like it as a shareholder and where the risks may lie:

What I like:
Google, unlike many of the frontier AI labs, owns the full stack. From TPU chips, Google Cloud hosting, closed (Gemini) and open (Gemma) models to consumer devices, they own everything, including the ability to train the AI models from their users' data (hoovered up from Google Maps, YouTube, Search data, etc.)

From 2022 - 2024, the consensus thinking was that Google was late to the game, which in hindsight, was true. But what most people did not recognize at the time was that Google was swimming like a duck. Above the water's surface, things seemed to be status quo but underwater, the team was working around the clock. The Code Red announcement -- which Sundar must have known would be leaked -- only reinforced the urgency of the situation.

Now, following this week's earnings, it's clear that Google Cloud is a key advantage over the independent AI labs (namely OpenAI and Anthropic), who have to pay a hefty margin on top of the already competitive API pricing they are charging its customers. Since Google is vertically integrated, they need to balance serving its internal customers (Gmail, Gemini users) and its external customers (Anthropic and other hosted models). Per Sundar on a recent podcast interview, internal customers have much longer LTV than external customers, who can switch with little notice.

I like owning Google because it gives me wide exposure AI. It's like owning a basket of AI stock all under one roof. I don't have to worry about excess capex capacity because its external cloud customers can soak it up; I can't say the same for Meta or Oracle, who have similar problems but different end customers to serve. 

Given my bullish views on AI, holding Google for the long-term is a no brainer to me. 

It's quite amazing how quickly the public narrative can shift once execution is on display in the public markets. I think having quarterly reporting is a strength, not a weakness, of the U.S. stock market. 

What I'm keeping an eye on:
Given my bullish views, my concern is primarily focused on execution and over investment in the near-term. Google is projecting capex of $180-190B in 2026, while their TTM cash flow (before capex) is $175B. This year they will essentially breakeven on cash flow. Another way to think about overextension is if they allocate their internal resource to pet projects or lesser known ROI projects. AI research can be a slippery slope: How much capex (or human researchers) do you allocate to a project without knowing what the return may be? You know you need to allocate resources because the math shows that by throwing more compute and people behind a problem, the better the solution but what does that look like?

Already we're hearing that researchers, who are assessed based on their server utilization, are re-running programs to artificially boost internal metrics lest they draw their manager's ire. How much of that is going on at Google today? If AI developments hit a plateau, how will Google know if its researchers are doing real work vs. fake work?

The AI race now appears to be Google's to lose. They have all the cards, now they just need to play it smart. 
]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2284159 2026-04-26T15:14:24Z 2026-04-26T15:14:31Z Intel


I sold Intel just a few days before the U.S. government announced their investment. It was sold via a covered call, which I thought was a fair price at the time. 

My thesis was that Intel being the sole national champion of semiconductors would never find itself facing bankruptcy and that the U.S. government would do whatever it could in its power to support it. I never imagined that the government would become an equity investor, though. My holding period was quite short, at around six months. 

The lesson I learned is that it takes a long time for a thesis to play out, especially for a capital intensive business like Intel. I should not have exited after making only a 20% gain if I had conviction in the stock. Drunkenmiller said it best: Position size matters. In this case, it wasn't a massive position but when I sold, I felt a bit of validation that I was "right" and made some money.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2283391 2026-04-23T23:16:52Z 2026-04-23T23:54:12Z Drake's Gem Set Rolex

A Rolex is a nice watch, but when you add factory-set gems onto, it takes it to a whole new level. Take for example, this latest offering from Wind Vintage

It's an incredible watch. What makes it extra special is that it wasn't locked up in a safe, but was actually worn. Watches are meant to be worn. It serves a purpose. If you can't manage to wear your watch, then it isn't for you. To me, Drake's watch is extra special because you can tell from the scratches and nicks that this was a watch that loved and worn.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2282858 2026-04-21T21:50:45Z 2026-04-21T21:50:45Z Apple's new CEO

So the time has finally come: Tim Cook is retiring later this year and has named his successor, John Ternus, senior vice president of Hardware Engineering. I liked that someone in hardware is going to lead Apple in its next phase in this new AI paradigm. I've been trying to find a Mac Mini the past couple of weeks; the Apple Stores have a backlog until July and all the marketplaces (Craigslist, Facebook, Swappa, eBay) have Mac Minis or M1 Max Macbooks priced quite high relative to their pre-OpenClaw prices.

Given the successor announcement and my difficulty in locating an affordable Mac Mini, I decided to place a small buy order of AAPL today. I opened a small position of $10,000 to start tracking the stock. From my research, I've noted that the Apple hardware differs from Windows in that the memory is unified (or shared) across OS and GPU. What that means in practice is that the memory can be used flexibly across CPU and GPU which is a powerful combination. In the Windows world, which I am most familiar with, my computer RAM and Nvidia GPU RAM (aka Video RAM or VRAM) are separate. 

When loading up local AI models, I'm limited by my GPU's RAM. Since I have an Nvidia 5080 that means my max VRAM is 16GB which is not that much; I can accommodate a model that is has about 13B parameters or so. Whereas a Mac with 32GB can use a much more powerful model. 

In my experience as a consumer trying to run AI models, my first preference would be use a local model since my costs are fixed. I don't see a massive market for on-demand inference where consumers are paying for tokens. People like Netflix and YouTube because the costs are known upfront. Given the pace of open source AI models, I expect that Apple silicone is going to be able to power ever more powerful open source models within the next 3 years. That will create demand for Apple hardware. Of course, cloud inference will always be around but will mostly be used by enterprises.

I'm excited for Apple. Having a hardware guy at the helm is the exact type of person they need to lead the company now. 

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2282853 2026-04-21T21:40:03Z 2026-04-21T21:43:07Z Finally installed the deployant (after 5 years of owning it)

Back in 2021, during Covid, I purchased an Artem RM-style deployant hoping to pair it with my IWC Big Pilot. But, alas, I couldn't get the fitting just right and the deployant required a tiny flathead screwdriver which I didn't own at the time.

Fast forward ~5 years later I finally found a screwdriver that fits the screw. I had it all along and never thought of using it until now. I actually bought an eyeglass screwdriver kit off Amazon for $4.50 but the flat edge was too thick so it didn't work. Of course, I was 3 days past the return window so now I have an unused, brand new screwdriver kit for whenever someone's eyeglasses' screw comes loose. 

The deployant is actually quite easy to install once the pin screw is screwed in. If makes a secure fit, much better than simply using a spring bar.

Here is the final result, which I quite like. The buckle is quite thin so it doesn't feel bulky. One thing that was surprising to me was that the deployant adds a bit of length so I actually had to size down. I'm now using the last strap hole. Shoutout to Holben's Watch Strap  for selling me the Fluco Alcantara watch strap for $45. You can get a coupon for signing up as a new customer.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2278217 2026-04-06T19:39:26Z 2026-04-06T19:57:27Z You can see the seesawing as investors digest the news in real-time

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2276992 2026-04-02T16:33:09Z 2026-04-02T16:40:36Z Trumps non-speech speech

I'm not usually a day trader, but I couldn't help myself when Trump and his team informed the public earlier this week that the President is going to make a speech to the American public on Wednesday at 9 pm ET. 

Leading up to the speech, Marco Rubio released the following 2 min video:

His tone made me feel less than 100% confident in the administration's plan, so I decided to follow my gut and place an order to buy two put options on $QQQ at $575. In other words, I'd only make money if $QQQ traded below the strike price of $575; the stock closed April 1 at $584.31, which means it would have to dip 2% before I make any money.

Here's the Trump speech:

This morning, I saw that $QQQ was trading at or just below $585, so I immediately placed a market order to close my position. I pocketed nearly $400. It feels good to make money and even better following my gut. However, as Drunkenmiller has said, it doesn't matter that you're right: You need to be right AND have conviction (by putting up a big position). It's fine to lose (a little bit of) money and be wrong, but not that great if you're right and made only a few bucks. 

Thankfully I sold in time (hey, making money is still making money) as $QQQ has since recovered from this morning's low:

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2270308 2026-03-12T03:19:03Z 2026-03-12T03:21:12Z VTI: Buy and hold

Over a sufficiently long period of time, VTI has always had a positive return. There's something to be said about a buy and hold mentality and the American economy's innovative spirit. If you have the patience, the power of compounding even works in your favor because of the dividends that are paid that generate a return when reinvested. Bet on America.

On the other hand, buying single stocks and holding may not necessarily get you any returns. In this case, I've held Disney for over a decade and actually LOST money. Who would have thought that Disney, known for its parks and movies, could have negative returns after holding for a decade??

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2259836 2026-02-05T03:50:51Z 2026-02-05T03:51:04Z IH-2526J Iron Heart canvas jacket

I bought this jacket over the summer (absolute steal on eBay), BUT the issue is that the jacket is snug. I can only wear a t-shirt underneath. Also, the cuff is too tight for me to wear a wrist watch, so I leave the cuff unbuttoned. I wasn't sure if this is considered faux pas for a jacket this nice. Did a quick Google Images search, and turn out that most people do leave the cuff button undone. Vindicated!

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2259733 2026-02-04T21:48:46Z 2026-02-04T21:48:46Z New strap

Replaced a traditional NATO with a stretchy NATO strap. 

What I did:

1/ Cut the strap so there's less material

2/ I burned the end with a small candle to ensure the material doesn't fall apart as easily

3/ Inserted the metal clasp

I quite like this new strap. I'll try it for a couple of weeks.


]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2259667 2026-02-04T18:24:00Z 2026-02-04T18:24:17Z GenAI images is helpful for online shopping

Since buying a vintage Rolex submariner, I've been eyeing various bracelets to swap out the OEM one to an aftermarket one. The reason is simply I want something different.

Some options that I'm considering:

1/ Staib Milanese bracelets

Staib 2784 2785 Polished Stainless Steel Milanese Mesh Watch Bracelet - Holbens

Staib 2792 Matte Stainless Steel Milanese Mesh Watch Bracelet - Holbens

2/ Forstner's Rolex bracelets

These are very high quality bracelets (read: $$$) and before pulling the trigger, I asked Manus to help imagine what they would look like on a Sub. Here are the results (including some that I passed on):

rolex_on_ladder_braceletpng


rolex_on_mesh_braceletpng


rolex_on_president_braceletpng

After looking at these results, I may just stick with the OEM bracelet. It's hard to imagine anything else fitting a Sub, frankly.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2243968 2025-12-11T22:02:14Z 2026-02-04T18:24:00Z AI is not taking away jobs

You can't expect people to understand how to use AI without holding their hands. A lot of my work involves using AI to enhance my productivity. AI has helped me save lots of time, such as brainstorming ideas, preparing call scripts in advance of an important meeting, formatting data, transcribing text from an image, etc. I work with a lot of young people (aka "the iPhone generation") who are just starting to use AI. 

At work, we encourage everyone to use AI as much as possible. But without specific direction on how to use AI, it seems that these young people have no idea what to do with AI. For example, we are preparing a year-end review post for the general public. My team member has for the past year written a weekly newsletter sharing the latest updates in a specific industry. When asked to prepare an outline on the key milestones that occurred this year, he was completely stumped on how to do it. He showed me a YTD stock price performance chart that ends in June and thought it might be relevant; hello, we're now in December!

So I simply asked him to copy and paste the financial and key highlights from each newsletter into a Google Doc, then we'd discuss it together in the afternoon. My plan is to show him that once you have all the data collected in a central document, you can then provide AI with specific guidance to create a blog post. Otherwise if you simply ask AI to generate a post without clear directions, all you'll get is AI slop. I need to show him step-by-step on what to do. 

Although AI is extremely capable, technology without critical thinking is useless. If I gave you a computer but you don't know how to use a keyboard and mouse, what good is that computer to you? That's how I think about AI: you need to know how to use AI in order to really get value out of it. Otherwise it's just a fancy piece of technology that sits idle, much like my home gym equipment.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2243902 2025-12-11T17:51:19Z 2026-02-04T18:24:06Z Coffee

I usually drink a cup of French pressed coffee each morning, but today I decided to make myself a pour over coffee. It's incredible how much more flavor there is with a pour over. I like a pour over because it avoids overbrewing the coffee, which can lead to poor flavor. The trick to making pour over coffee is having the right amount of coffee grounds. If there's too little grounds you get a weak brew and vice versa. I'm not a coffee expert and eyeball all my brews, that said, I really enjoyed my morning coffee with a splash of lactose free milk.

]]>
tag:mrzod.com,2013:Post/2238944 2025-11-21T15:21:19Z 2026-02-04T18:24:12Z What is Strategy (ticker MSTR)?

With bitcoin testing a floor resistance at the $82K level, I figured I'd dive into the various preferred stocks that public investors like you and me can invest in. I ran a bunch of AI queries using this prompt: 

Explain all the strategy (ticker MSTR) public securities available for public investors to trade. Such as $STRK, $STRF, $STRD, $STRC, and $STRE and also $STRC. Explain what they are, how they are different from each other, how does the investment make money, and are the risks, etc. Think through the lens as a potential buyer of these securities and determine what you would need to know to make an informed buying decision.

Here are the results alongside the AI model (in no particular order):

]]>